Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fiona Crawley vs Timea Babos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Crawley vs Babos analysis and find out who is favored!
Fiona Crawley vs Timea Babos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Crawley 1 - 0 Babos
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Crawley has won 50.89% of points on their second serve, while Babos has won 46.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Crawley, in recent form, has won 60.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Babos has won 50.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 49.03% and 38.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Crawley has saved 62.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Babos has saved 57.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Crawley has won 84% of matches played (W/L 21/ 4), with Babos winning 49.02% (W/L 25/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Crawley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 31/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Babos has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 82/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 24/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Crawley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 88.89% of matches (W/L 16/ 2), where as Babos has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.13% of matches (W/L 17/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Crawley winning 1 times and Babos being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Crawley winning 2 and Babos winning 1. The last match between Crawley and Babos was at the U.S. Open - New York, 25-08-2023, Q2 round, Hard with Fiona Crawley getting the victory 6-2 3-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Crawley and Babos have played a deciding set 1 times, with Crawley winning 1 times and Babos 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Crawley winning 1, and Babos 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Crawley has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.04 while Babos has played against players with an average rank of 218.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Crawley has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Babos has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Crawley has converted 50.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Babos has converted 42.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
382
Rank
371
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
235
Rank
25
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
72% (31-12)
Career Total W/L
56% (434-335)
100% (5-0)
YTD W/L
54% (14-12)
$81,500
Career Prize Money
$1,941,606
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fiona Crawley | Timea Babos |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:53:0 | 2:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (60/80) | 59% (67/113) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (39/60) | 64% (43/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (13/20) | 43% (20/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (50/113) | 35% (28/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Fiona Crawley
Player
Timea Babos
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
113)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fiona Crawley | Timea Babos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 100% (5/0) | 54% (14/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 83% (10/2) | 54% (32/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 64% (69/39) | 51% (293/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 100% (5/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 89 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:24 | 1:55:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 261.8 | 246.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (236/348) | 63% (1200/1901) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (149/236) | 64% (765/1200) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (57/112) | 46% (325/701) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (30/59) | 43% (101/236) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (205/387) | 43% (824/1929) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (5/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (5/5) | 52% (13/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 10% (10/1) |
Fiona Crawley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Ashley Lahey
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Olivia Lincer
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Liv Hovde
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Carson Branstine
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Thea Frodin
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Chloe Beck
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
76%
(
78 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Nicole Khirin
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Sophie Chang
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Catherine Harrison
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Timea Babos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Timea Babos
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Timea Babos
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Timea Babos
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Allie Kiick
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
14
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Timea Babos
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Victoria Osuigwe
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Crawley Vs Babos Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Crawley are available here and Babos photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
